NBA Selects Kalshi and Polymarket for Prediction Markets, Partners with CFTC to Secure Market Integrity

The National Basketball Association has officially designated Kalshi and Polymarket as its preferred prediction market exchanges. Additionally, the NBA has entered into an information-sharing agreement with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to safeguard the integrity of basketball-related prediction markets.
This strategic move was announced on Monday, highlighting agreements that grant Kalshi and Polymarket access to official NBA data through Sportradar, the league’s appointed data distributor. The platforms will use this data to settle authorized market outcomes, and both have secured rights to utilize NBA intellectual property and run promotional campaigns within the United States.
Integral to these partnerships are strict measures to maintain integrity; NBA personnel and team members are prohibited from trading NBA event contracts. The agreements also establish protocols for collaborative investigations into suspicious trading activities.
Beyond Kalshi and Polymarket, the NBA has expanded its existing agreement with DraftKings to include prediction markets. The league also plans to announce similar partnerships with other industry players in the near future.
In a related statement, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig emphasized that the collaboration with the NBA will enhance data sharing efforts aimed at combating insider trading and fraud within prediction markets. With this agreement, the NBA joins Major League Baseball and the National Hockey League in forging these regulatory partnerships.
These agreements come amid ongoing legal disputes concerning the supremacy of federal commodities regulations over state laws governing sports betting and prediction markets.
The legal contention has resulted in contradictory court rulings. In September, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled against Kalshi in cases involving Ohio and Tennessee, following a similar verdict from the Ninth Circuit. Conversely, the Third Circuit allowed Kalshi to continue operating in New Jersey while appeals are underway.
Enforcement actions by states persist. On October 20, Utah’s Attorney General Derek Brown filed a lawsuit against Kalshi, alleging that since 2024 the platform has facilitated unlawful betting within the state. Utah officials seek to reclaim an estimated $30 to $60 million in profits reportedly earned by Kalshi and other defendants.
The US Supreme Court has been petitioned to review the legal dispute centered on New Jersey. The petition has garnered support from 39 states and the District of Columbia. Notably, the National Football League, which has not engaged in commercial partnerships with prediction market exchanges, also supports the petition, expressing concerns that certain sports event contracts could undermine game integrity due to their vulnerability to manipulation. The Court has yet to decide whether to take up the case.
Kalshi and Polymarket’s designation as preferred partners, coupled with their collaboration with the CFTC, reflects the NBA’s proactive stance in reinforcing prediction market transparency and integrity amidst a complex and evolving regulatory landscape. These steps not only promote fair play but also set a precedent for managing sports-related financial markets in a coordinated and compliant manner.
The NBA's collaboration with Kalshi, Polymarket, and the CFTC underscores the importance of regulatory cooperation in protecting the integrity of sports prediction markets. In the broader context of ongoing legal challenges, these partnerships highlight efforts to balance innovation with compliance and integrity in a rapidly developing sector.
Maintaining market integrity safeguards the interests of fans, stakeholders, and the league’s reputation while addressing legal uncertainties posed by overlapping state and federal jurisdictions.
Why it matters
This development illustrates the NBA’s commitment to integrity and regulatory compliance in sports prediction markets, setting a significant example in an industry facing legal challenges over jurisdiction and market manipulation.
Prepared from the source material with AI-assisted editing and checked against the supplied facts.
Open original source ↗