LOOK CRYPTO · DATA PIPELINE

Data collection status

Checking collection status…

← All news
CRYPTO NEWS

Zano Rolls Back Blockchain by a Month Following Gateway Address Exploit

Cointelegraph · Felix Ng

The Zano project team rolled back its blockchain by approximately one month following the discovery of a vulnerability involving Gateway Addresses. This issue enabled unauthorized circulation of ZANO and Freedom Dollar (fUSD) tokens, breaking the fixed supply promise. Zano restarted its blockchain from block 3,833,000, just before Hard Fork 6 introduced the affected feature. The recovery demands that nodes, miners, stakers, exchanges, and other services adopt the update to secure the network and restore trust.

Blockchain Rollback and Its Implications

To address the consequences of the vulnerability, Zano rolled back its blockchain to block 3,833,000, effectively reverting to a state before Hard Fork 6 activated the vulnerable Gateway Addresses feature. This rollback invalidates roughly a month of blockchain history, including both legitimate transactions and unauthorized tokens minted due to the exploit. Transactions from that period will no longer appear on the restored chain and will require reconciliation. However, payments already settled on other blockchains cannot be reversed.

The Zano team is preparing a compensation and claims process to address potential losses incurred by users affected by the incident. Quinten van Welzen, Zano’s head of marketing and growth, explained that without such action unauthorized ZANO and fUSD tokens would remain in circulation without limits, diluting the value for all holders and breaking the fundamental promise of a fixed token supply. He emphasized that ignoring the exploit would incentivize attackers to retain value from stolen tokens, undermining the project’s integrity.

The Gateway Address Vulnerability

Zano has not yet released a comprehensive post-mortem report but confirmed the exploitation stemmed from its Gateway Addresses feature. Gateway Addresses were designed to simplify integration for bridges, exchanges, and payment services by allowing management of funds through a single account-style balance, unlike Zano’s previous use of UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output) models.

Previously, Zano wallets tracked funds as separate outputs, making it more complex for exchanges and services to scan, identify incoming payments, and select outputs for withdrawals. Gateway Addresses were introduced in Hard Fork 6 but introduced the vulnerability that allowed unauthorized token creation.

Restarting the blockchain prior to Hard Fork 6 removes the problematic Gateway Address functionality and restores the pre-fork accounting method, thereby resolving the issue.

About Zano and Future Prospects

Zano launched in May 2019 as a layer-1 blockchain focused on private transactions. Transactions conceal sender, receiver, amount, and asset type, ensuring privacy. Besides its native ZANO token, Zano supports custom digital asset creation. Freedom Dollar (fUSD) is one such token operating on Zano’s blockchain.

Van Welzen acknowledged that rolling back a month of blockchain history results in a loss of work and a blow to trust that the team must rebuild. Nevertheless, they see the rollback as essential to uphold the agreed fixed supply and provide a foundation for recovery. He stressed that the alternative—doing nothing—would mean seven years of development going to waste, as the project’s reputation and control over its currency would be irreparably damaged.

Why it matters

The news of Zano’s significant blockchain rollback due to a vulnerability in Gateway Addresses is a critical episode for the broader crypto ecosystem. It highlights the risks of deploying new features without thorough audits and testing in active blockchain projects. Rolling back a month of history is a drastic measure impacting users, exchanges, and services, necessitating reconciliation of transactions during that period. However, the Zano team’s transparent acknowledgment of the issue and plans for compensation emphasize accountability and responsibility. This case serves as a cautionary tale for other blockchain teams about balancing innovation with security and the importance of maintaining community trust, even at the cost of short-term disruption.

Prepared from the source material with AI-assisted editing and checked against the supplied facts.

Open original source ↗