LOOK CRYPTO · DATA PIPELINE

Data collection status

Checking collection status…

← All news
CRYPTO NEWS

Robinhood CEO Opposes Issuer Veto Power Over Tokenized Stocks

Cointelegraph · Ezra Reguerra

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev stated that companies should not have veto power over tokenized stock products that do not alter shareholder rights, issuer obligations, or a company's official stock ledger. This position was shared following criticism from AMC's CEO, who expressed concern about Robinhood's token offerings issued without the company's consent.

Robinhood CEO’s Stance on Tokenized Stocks

Vlad Tenev clarified in a post on X that the issue of issuer consent depends on whether a tokenized product alters the rights tied to the underlying shares or creates new obligations for the company or its transfer agent. If such changes occur, issuer involvement is necessary.

However, if the product constitutes a separate financial instrument holding or referencing freely transferable shares without modifying issuer rights or shareholder records, consent from the issuer should not be required.

Response to AMC’s Criticism and Robinhood’s Token Structure

On September 18, Tenev responded to criticism from AMC’s CEO Adam Aron, who stated that AMC had no affiliation with Robinhood’s token products and planned to consult securities counsel.

According to Tenev, Robinhood Stock Tokens use a third-party structure comprising separately issued instruments backed one-to-one by underlying shares. These products provide economic exposure to stocks and ETFs without changing the issuer’s capitalization table or shareholder rights.

He emphasized that moving onchain should not grant issuers a veto power they never held in offchain systems.

Why it matters

The viewpoint expressed by Robinhood’s CEO highlights an important discussion in the regulation of digital assets and tokenized securities. Not requiring issuer consent for tokenized products that do not affect ownership rights or obligations could foster growth in tokenized stock markets and investor access. At the same time, maintaining issuer involvement when rights are altered ensures a balanced approach protecting stakeholder interests.

Prepared from the source material with AI-assisted editing and checked against the supplied facts.

Open original source ↗